Member-only story

Aftershock: The Ethics of Contemporary Transgressive Art

Dalton Foster

·10.7k Followers· Follow

Published in Kieran Cashell

6 min read · 2 weeks before

676 View Claps

62 Respond

Save

Listen

Contemporary transgressive art is a controversial and often misunderstood genre that pushes the boundaries of what is considered acceptable in art. It can be shocking, offensive, and even illegal. But it can also be thought-provoking, challenging, and transformative.

Aftershock: The Ethics of Contemporary Transgressive Art

by Kieran Cashell

4.2 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	10306 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	299 pages

In "Aftershock: The Ethics of Contemporary Transgressive Art," author Sarah Jones explores the complex ethical issues surrounding this genre. She examines the potential for transgressive art to provoke, offend, and incite change, as well as the arguments for and against censorship.

Jones argues that transgressive art has the potential to be a powerful force for social good. It can challenge our assumptions, expose injustices, and open up new ways of thinking about the world. However, she also acknowledges that transgressive art can be harmful, especially when it is used to exploit or demean others.

Ultimately, Jones argues that the decision of whether or not to censor transgressive art is a complex one that must be made on a case-by-case basis. There is no easy answer, and there are strong arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

The Potential Benefits of Transgressive Art

Transgressive art can have a number of potential benefits, including:

It can challenge our assumptions. Transgressive art often challenges our assumptions about what is acceptable in art and in society. It can force us to question our beliefs and values, and to see the world in new ways.
It can expose injustices. Transgressive art can be used to expose injustices and to raise awareness of important social issues. It can give a voice to the voiceless and help to bring about change.
It can open up new ways of thinking. Transgressive art can help us to see the world in new ways and to imagine new possibilities. It can inspire us to be more creative and to think outside the box.

The Potential Risks of Transgressive Art

Transgressive art can also have a number of potential risks, including:

It can be offensive. Transgressive art is often intended to shock and offend. It can use explicit or disturbing imagery, and it can deal with taboo subjects. This can be upsetting or even harmful for some viewers.
It can be used to exploit or demean others. Transgressive art can be used to exploit or demean others, especially when it is used to portray violence, sexism, or racism. This can be harmful to the individuals who are depicted, and it can also contribute to negative stereotypes.
It can be used to incite violence. Transgressive art can be used to incite violence, especially when it is used to promote hate speech or to glorify violence. This can be dangerous and it can lead to real-world harm.

The Case for Censorship

There are a number of arguments in favor of censoring transgressive art. These arguments include:

It can protect people from harm. Censorship can be used to protect people from being exposed to harmful content, such as violence, pornography, and hate speech. This is especially important for children, who are more vulnerable to the effects of these types of content.
It can promote social harmony. Censorship can be used to promote social harmony by preventing the spread of ideas that are harmful or divisive. This can help to create a more tolerant and respectful society.
It can protect the integrity of art. Censorship can be used to protect the integrity of art by preventing the spread of works that are considered to be obscene or offensive. This can help to ensure that art remains a respected and valued form of expression.

The Case Against Censorship

There are also a number of arguments against censorship. These arguments include:

It can stifle creativity. Censorship can stifle creativity by preventing artists from expressing themselves freely. This can lead to a less vibrant and less diverse artistic landscape.
It can lead to a slippery slope. Once we start censoring one type of art, it becomes easier to justify censoring other types of art. This can lead to a slippery slope where more and more art is censored, until we are left with only the most bland and inoffensive works.
It can be ineffective. Censorship is often ineffective in preventing people from accessing harmful content. In fact, it can sometimes have the opposite effect, by making people more curious about the censored material.

The debate over transgressive art is a complex one, with strong arguments on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to censor transgressive art is a difficult one that must be made on a case-by-case basis. There is no easy answer, and there are valid arguments to be made on both sides.

However, it is important to remember that transgressive art has the potential to be a powerful force for good. It can challenge our assumptions, expose injustices, and open up new ways of thinking about the world. It is also important to remember that censorship can have a number of negative consequences, including stifling creativity and leading to a slippery slope. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to censor transgressive art is a complex one that must be made on a case-by-case basis.

Aftershock: The Ethics of Contemporary Transgressive Art

by Kieran Cashell

4.2 out of 5